2/10생존

모든 아이디어는 돈을 낼 구매자, 토론 속 근거, 실제 시장 공백을 보여 준 뒤, 아이디어를 무너뜨리려는 레드팀을 통과해야 했습니다.

  1. 25검토한 스토리
  2. 5정독
  3. 10제안된 아이디어
  4. 2살아남음

탈락 8

  • abi3t migration and audit tool for native Python wheels6.2

    Quoted the discussion instead of paraphrasing.

  • Cross-platform agent sandbox policy generator and auditor6.0

    Quoted the discussion instead of paraphrasing.

  • Simple per-app folder permissions for desktop users5.6

    Quoted the discussion instead of paraphrasing.

  • Deterministic replay debugging for flaky CI races5.5

    Scored 5.5, under the 6.0 bar.

  • AI-assisted Nix flake authoring and debugging tool5.4

    Too weak on moat (3/10).

  • Orchestration framework for quality-gated coding agent pipelines4.4

    Everyone is hand-rolling this on LangGraph/CrewAI/GitHub Actions and incumbents (LangGraph, Devin, GitHub) are shipping governance features — it's a framework feature, not a company.

탈락한 8개 모두 보기
  • Per-issue cost and efficiency tracking for agent pipelines4.1

    Near-duplicate of the recently published per-developer AI spend control idea, and per-unit cost attribution is a feature Langfuse/Helicone/Portkey will ship on top of existing tracing.

  • Minimal auditable cross-platform sandbox SDK4.1

    Solo founders and small teams won't pay for a sandbox library — this is open-source territory (bubblewrap, seatbelt wrappers) where trust accrues to free OSS, not a $50-300/mo SDK.