مدقق امتثال إلغاء الاشتراكات عبر الولايات القضائية لأنشطة الاشتراكات

تدقيق مستمر لمسارات الإلغاء بما يتوافق مع قوانين كل ولاية قضائية، مع تزايد قوانين «الإلغاء بنقرة واحدة» حول العالم.

I want to build a small, bootstrappable product. Help me plan and start the MVP.

Product: Cross-jurisdiction cancellation compliance auditor for subscription businesses
What it is: Continuously audited, jurisdiction-compliant cancellation flows for subscription businesses as click-to-cancel laws multiply.
Who pays: Heads of legal/compliance and founders at US consumer subscription businesses (DTC, SaaS, digital media) with $1M–$50M ARR; $500–2,000/mo from the legal/compliance tooling budget, replacing ad-hoc outside-counsel reviews
Closest alternatives: Stripe Billing (built-in cancel flows, but no cross-jurisdiction compliance guid, G2-tracked compliance suites like Vanta/Drata (focused on security frameworks, n, Outside counsel / boutique consumer-protection law firms (expensive, one-off), Chargebee / Recurly retention flows (optimize against cancellation, not complian
The gap: Billing platforms give you a cancel button but say nothing about whether your flow, fees, and retention screens are legal in each of the ~10+ state/city regimes now in force; compliance platforms cover SOC2/GDPR, not consumer cancellation statutes. Nobody offers a living, jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction rulebook plus flow auditing for cancellation UX.
Why now: NYC's rule just took effect, nine-plus states already have similar laws, California's regime is maturing, and an EU Digital Fairness Act is expected imminently — the fragmentation the commenters complain about is happening in the last 12–18 months.
Moat to build toward: The continuously updated jurisdiction rule corpus and a database of audited flows/enforcement actions compounds; once a company's cancel flow is certified and monitored through you, switching means re-auditing.

موجز جاهز للصق في Claude Code أو Cursor أو أي وكيل برمجة (بالإنجليزية).